Android has 80% user share, but only 25% of iOS’ revenue

The below graph might be shocking to some but it’s not a trick of the eye, Android have an almost 80% share of the world’s smartphone unit sales, and this is expected to grow for the next couple of years at least. It may come as a surprise considering Apple’s success in the market and the idea of the smartphone war as a close two horse race between Apple and Google, but the facts don’t lie, when it comes to operating system user share, Google’s Android is the clear winner. Apple’s iOS only accounts for roughly 15% of all global smartphone sales.

Android’s rise has been staggering over the last four years, with their share of the user base almost doubling each year, the result of smartphones becoming more readily available in emerging markets which are targeted by producers of devices on the cheaper end of the scale that run Android.

But while stats like this might suggest that Apple could face serious trouble maintaining their position in the market over the coming years, the graph doesn’t necessarily paint a complete picture of the state of play. Android may have over 1bn monthly active users (not including those in China or on Kindle devices) compared to Apple’s 470m, but figures from Google’s IO event last month seem to confirm that Android users spend a significant amount less on apps for their device than their Apple counterparts.

Estimates from tech analyst Benedict Evans last week suggest that Apple earn, on average, more than four times the amount per user from apps than Google. Apple paid out an estimated $10bn to developers for sales of iOS apps over the last 12 months compared to Google’s $5bn to developers of Android apps. Taking into account their respective user bases this leaves Apple’s ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) at $21 compared to Android’s ARPU of $5.

This puts an entirely different spin on the shape of the smartphone industry. When you take into account the massive profits that Apple makes from the sales of it’s hardware this becomes even more stark. Android might be eating the market, but Apple have got the customers that matters, at least when it comes to cold hard cash.

android_vs_ios

Posted by Rob in Android, Apple, Apps, iOS

A quick look at Google’s new design approach

Android is getting a new lick of paint this Autumn with an update known as Android L. The design changes centre around a new ‘material design’ style which Google says is based on basic shapes and sheets of paper. This version features some slick new animations and what Google likes to call meaningful transitions. It seems that, in terms of design and intuitiveness at least, Android is starting to catch up with iOS.

Posted by Rob in Android, Design, Google

Biometric wearables could eliminate passwords & keys

The potential of wearable technology and the internet of things seem to be hot topics at the moment and many are waiting on the arrival of Apple’s iWatch in the Autumn to kick this space into gear. In the meantime though, devices like this slick wrist band Nymi give us a glimpse of the possibilities of living in a world where we are constantly connected to the things around us.

Nymi  utilizes motion sensors and location tracking to pick up user movement and lets the wearer open car doors, login to their computers and make wireless payments, among other things, all with a flick of their wrist. The device uses the wearer’s heartbeat (yep that’s right, heartbeat!) for authentication purposes, thus removing the need for constant passwords and pretty much being as secure as you can really hope for.

Travel technology site Skift also highlights how devices  like this could streamline the travel experience, allowing wearers to check-in for a flight, drop off baggage and enter an aircraft all via unmanned gates, as well as skipping hotel check-ins and accessing your room all via the wristband.

If devices like this can remove the need for carrying keys and remembering passwords, they could really positively impact our lives. Either way, I have a feeling we are about to see a lot more of this type of thing over the coming months.

Posted by Rob in Apple Watch, Wearables

Smartphones steal ‘user time’ in emerging markets too

Further confirmation (not that any was needed) that smartphones are winning the battle for people’s time and attention across the world comes from KPCB analyst Mary Meeker, who made her annual Internet Trends presentation at Code Conference last week.

Some of her analysis focusing primarily on developing countries such as Indonesia, the Philippines, China, Brazil, Vietnam, and Nigeria makes for interesting reading. It would appear from these stats that smartphone proliferation is not simply a Western phenomenon and with smartphones getting cheaper and cheaper every year, this trend is expected to continue. With consumers in these countries (mainly where laptop penetration is particularly low) now able to access the internet for the first time from a smartphone rather than a traditional desktop or laptop computer, this is also having an impact on how they consume media, with smartphones quickly becoming the go-to medium, replacing even TV in some countries.

Smartphones, Emerging Markets, Tablets

Posted by Rob in Mobile, Old Media, Stats

Google’s self-driving car and the future of the taxi

Another week, another cutesy PR video, and another one of the Big Four’s moonshot projects gets a little closer to reality. While most articles that were circulating on the reveal of Google’s self-driving car dealt with it’s rather cartoon-like appearance or the multitude of regulations that will need to be negotiated before a concept like this becomes viable, The Irish Times looked at how self-driving cars could revolutionize the taxi industry in big cities.

Detailing a report by Lawrence D. Burns, former VP of R&D at General Motors and now a Google consultant, it was suggested that, if such a project becomes viable, it could reduce the cost of running a taxi service by almost 90%, significantly reducing wait times in the process.

The researchers found that Manhattan’s 13,000 taxis made 470,000 trips a day. Their average speed was between 10 and 11 mph, carrying an average of 1.4 passengers per trip with an average wait time of five minutes.

In comparison, it is possible for a futuristic robot fleet of 9,000 shared automated vehicles hailed by smartphone to match that capacity with a wait time of less than one minute.

Assuming a 15% profit, the current cost of a taxi service is about $4 per trip mile, while in contrast, it was estimated that a Manhattan-based driver-less vehicle fleet would cost about 50 cents per mile.

The fact that Google invested $250m in Uber just last year only makes this a more realistic vision. Imagine a fleet of 9,000 Uber / Google self-driving cars whizzing up and down New York’s streets ferrying people around for next to nothing. It’s all very ‘Minority Report‘, but I like it!

Posted by Rob in Google, Tech, Uber